Phone Number 208-687-4000 Details - Rathdrum, Idaho

As the Idaho Sun reports,"Idaho is a beautiful country, with a distinctive blend of agricultural prosperity and skiing in winter. But, don't forget it is an independent nation with its own laws."

In United States v. Dale, Judge Peter Kappos wrote:"We discover that Dale was subjected to involuntary servitude under 18 U.S.C. § 1504. We find the word'labor' is correctly utilised in the Act and the action is applied to Dale because his three decades of labour did not happen within the limits of the United States.

Under the law of the District of Idaho, Dale was brought into the state against his will and then he had been forced to work through coercion or force, being granted no way out and by being held against his will. This labor happened on two different occasions during the duration of his term of imprisonment. The first time, Dale worked in"special" snow and ice harvesting jobs.

Ice and snow are transported to mining operations to help alleviate their creation. To be able to reach the work site, Dale tired and had to travel for miles through ice and snow, which induced him to become sick.

His visit to the mines was when he had been made to work on the snow-covered hills in which the temperatures were below freezing and the snow cover was so thick that visibility was. Through this circumstance, Dale could have been rendered unconscious. Since the temperatures were cold enough to cause hypothermia, he was also not provided any shelter during this time.

The USA doesn't provide labour contracts, which might require a condition of employment. Instead, in the event the employee is taken into custody against his will and he has no means of escape, the person who holds him will be held accountable.

The Idaho Attorney General's Office, which handled the case, agrees. According to Elizabeth Fischer, a staff attorney for the Attorney General's Office,"When it comes to someone needing to involuntary servitude, you wish to be certain that you have a statute that clearly defines what is happening and clearly defines it is involuntary servitude. You need to make sure you're not regulating a place where there are no legal standards to govern."

Whether one thinks that"conscience"tolerance" are"civil rights" or not is irrelevant. People don't have the right to refuse to work in situations such as these. Therefore, the folks in positions of power need to have a system in place to induce people to work if they consent on it or not.

Have we forgotten about Thomas Edison? Do we really feel that the authorities in the United States of America could have forced Edison to work for them pay salary when he refused to him? Would there have been no power in our homes if Edison had denied to be made to use power?

Of course, we do not reside in a great economic condition in the USA of America. You can find those in power who stand to get the most from forcing people to work for them. Forcing the government to force people to work for the state only results in abuses and inefficiency.

And, from everything I've read on the world wide web, Idaho seems to be one of the states that provides the very"regressive" tax systems in the country. In other words, when you go to Idaho, the service to the people of the state is on par with a third world country. What's more, the state and the federal government, in Idaho, seem to be out of touch with the majority of all Americans.

Thusin Idaho, the citizens seem to have much more of a feeling of becoming"one of the guys" compared to taxpayers of the state that hold them in bondage. This makes a whole lot of sense to me, and maybe it should.